Zaviye · Coverage map
Dawn (Pakistan)
Iran and the US engaged in a new wave of attacks on oil tankers, pushing oil prices past $100 and deepening regional tensions.
10 sources across English · blind spot: little coverage from the right
Left 20% · Center 70% · Right 10%
How outlets framed it
Left: Iran's actions are framed as a justified response to U.S. aggression, with emphasis on regional security and the disruption of Western oil interests.
Center: The conflict is portrayed as a cycle of escalation with mutual accusations, focusing on the immediate military actions and their economic consequences.
Right: Iran's attacks are seen as provocative and destabilizing, with emphasis on the threat to global oil markets and the need for Western military deterrence.
Key divergence: Left-leaning sources highlight Iran's defensive posture and regional power dynamics, while right-leaning sources frame the attacks as destabilizing and a threat to global energy security.
Source-by-source bias tags and translations live in the interactive view.
The coverage
10 of the 10 articles behind this story, grouped by where the outlet sits on the spectrum. Links go to the publisher.
Topics
The Middle East oil benchmark. Moves on Hormuz risk, OPEC+ decisions and Gulf supply disruption.
US benchmark. The Brent-WTI spread widens when the risk premium is specifically regional, not global.
More on Iran-US conflict
All 61 →
